CRIME; When you can be charged, and possible defenses
By Chidi
W.Nwachukwu Esq.
Criminality and wanton destruction of lives and property seem
to define our country today more than any time in our
history, even if our leaders may like to think differently. According to the
Black Law Dictionary,8th Edition, ‘’Crime is defined as an act the
law makes punishable, the breach of a legal duty treated as a subject matter of
criminal proceedings’’. Many are of the
opinion that criminality is on the increase because those who committed crime in the past
did not get punishment , thereby making it attractive to do so subsequently with impunity. There
are as many reasons as there are people why crimes are committed among which
are quest for wealth, avarice, jealousy ,prestige, etc. however, the purpose of
the law is to find out whether a crime
has been committed or otherwise and make appropriate pronouncements.
Under the criminal law
we have all kinds of crime such as kidnapping, murder, stealing etc. Basically
criminal law seeks to protect people from harm by inflicting punishment on
those who have already done harm and threatening with punishment those who are
tempted to do harm. The harm criminal law
aims to prevent varies, it may be
physical harm, death or bodily injuries to human beings, the loss or damage to
properties, sexual immorality, danger to the government, disturbance to public
peace and order or injury to public health. Conduct that threatens to cause ,but
has not yet caused a harm ,may be enough to constitute a crime .Thus criminal
law often strive to avoid harm by forbidding conduct that may lead to harmful
result.
To be guilty of a crime, a person must either
have performed a voluntary physical act or failed to act when he or she
has a legal duty to do so. In other words there is no criminal liability for
bad thought alone .Thus a child may earnestly wish his father dead and may even
think of killing the parent so that he can inherit their property, however if the parents eventually die without any
proof that the boy was responsible for their death, he will not be guilty of
the crime.
Often times crimes are committed by a specific action- for
example the pulling of a trigger or thrusting of a knife in murder or the lighting of a fire in arson.
Some crimes are however defined in terms of omission or commission, for
instance watching someone drown in the river by a lifeguard could amount to an
offence hence his duty is to ensure safety of swimmers, but a passerby who
merely watch someone drown may have no case to answer. In the former scenario there
is a duty but in the latter, no such duty exist.
A person must have had intent to act in a harmful way before
he can be liable to a crime, lawyers describe this as mens rea, a Latin word meaning guilty mind. This
is why most crimes are defined with terms such as knowingly, maliciously,
intentionally, negligently, willfully or recklessly acting to bring about a
particular situation .It is important to note that mens rea distinguishes between inadvertent act or accidental act ,and acts for which someone is criminally
liable. For instance, a man who desires to kill his friend and in the course of
driving to work unknowingly run over that friend who was crossing the road, he
has not committed murder. However if you
intended to shoot somebody and the bullet strayed and kills another, the
intent will be transferred from the original target to the one harmed, in other
word you are still guilty of murder whether the target was the one hit by your bullet or not.
Crimes do not just attract punishment stricto sensu, there are defenses that the accused can
put forward to defend himself, which will be weighed by the court to see its
merit or otherwise. Under the criminal law the requirement is usually to prove
beyond reasonable doubt. Largely speaking, defense is a broad term refers to
numerous claims that serve to rebut or refute the claim, mitigate, moderate,
justify or excuse conduct that the state labeled criminal. Some defenses are
factual, for instance the defense of alibi where the accused is saying that he was not at
the scene of the crime when it was committed. Other defenses such as insanity,
mistake, intoxication or self defense acknowledges the fact that the accused indeed
committed the crime but asserts that he should not be held responsible for
reasons aforementioned . It should be borne in mind that the defense of alibi
does not just end there. When an accused says that he was not at the scene of
crime or within the vicinity when a crime was committed, he is mandated to tell
the court where he was at that time, and it will be verified by the police. Some
defenses serve to explain the circumstances of the action and defeat criminal
liability, for instance if a person kills another in self defense the law
provides that the prohibited act is justified and not appropriate for
punishment.
The above position is supported by section 33(2) of the 1999
constitution which states that’’ a person
shall not be regarded as having been deprived of his life in contravention of
this section, if he dies as a result of the use to such extent and in such
circumstances as are permitted by law ,of such force as necessary;(a) for the defense
of any person from unlawful violence or for the defense of property ;and {b) in
order to effect a lawful arrest or to prevent the escape of a person lawful
detained’’.
However, the court will look at the
proportionality of such defense by the accused, if for instance the attacker
had a bunch of broom in its hand threatening to hit the accused and in response
the accused shot him with a gun, he may be guilty of a crime. The defense of
insanity is based on the premise that those who are unable to control their
minds or appreciates the criminality of their actions due to mental defects or
illness should not be punished under the criminal law. The insanity defense in
this case is a legal test of criminal responsibility that does not necessarily
have to conform to the medical definition of mental illness, all that is
required is that at the commission of the crime the accused was not mentally
sound as to be criminally responsible. It must be noted however that even if
one is insane for most of the time and at a particular moment he became sane and
committed a crime, he will be liable, a situation lawyers call lucid interval ( that is a moment one is
in control and conscious of himself)
Intoxication is also a
defense whether caused by alcohol or some substance that has soporific effect
on the consumer. An intoxicated offender may not be able to differentiate right
from wrong or may have irresistible impulse. For intoxication to be used as a
defense against a crime it must be involuntary (for example if one is forced to
consume an intoxicant or if one consumes an intoxicant without the knowledge of
its mentally disabling nature.) Different types of crime exist under the
criminal law which cannot be exhausted in this tiny piece of work, and several other topics shall be treated in
subsequent editions. For
questions and comments please contact the address below. or you consult a
Lawyer
Nwachukwu holds an LLB Hons from
the University of Lagos, Principal Counsel at
WILSON LEGAL and Lead Consultant, Divva Consulting, a ‘Think Tank’
Consulting Firm based in Abuja. You
can reach him at ifdlagos@yahoo.ca
08064281323
No comments:
Post a Comment